Geneva Telecom Antenna Map Illustrates How the “Stop 5G!” Campaign Misleads Supporters

By Peter Tocci

In What Do YOU Mean When You Say “5G”? (WDYM) much space is devoted to analyzing news stories about the dreaded “5G” rollout. Two of the greatest fallacies presented in this hysteria are 1) “5G” has not been tested for safety, and 2) there are many reports of harm when “5G” is turned on. The first is untrue, the second much confused.

Since WDYM covers these issues thoroughly, we won’t reinvent the wheel here, except to say that hysteria ‘1’ is a ploy. No one should be singling out “5G” about safety testing, since no ‘G’ has been properly tested from the outset – including “5G”.

So it’s quite irresponsible to make it sound like the other G’s have been safety tested. It’s been scientific fraud embraced by the FCC all the way in order to get this pathological atrocity intimately woven into society and people’s lives. You wouldn’t be off calling it evil.

Both hysterias arise from the fact that few opposers seem to know/acknowledge/care that “5G” isn’t one thing, but two. New international specifications cover the new, higher frequencies all the harangue is about, often called ‘millimeter wave’ (I designate it 5Gmmw); as well as the old 2G-4G frequencies called ‘sub-6 GHz’ or ‘mid-/low-band’ microwave frequencies (5Gmlb) — 4G “on steroids”. The quotes around “5G” indicate this misunderstanding.

A corollary is that “5G” opposition implies that we must be rid of “5G,” but that 3G/4G, though ultimately fatal,’ can be tamed with “tips” for reducing exposure and with “safe” exposure limits. The former is simply futile, since no exposure is safe. The latter is best described as a pipe dream. The establishment knew all the harm 20 years before 1G (see History of Official Awareness in WDYM).

Before we get to the harm issue, it’s necessary to understand that the ecosystem and humans have been exposed to radio frequencies for about a century.25. But especially telecom/WiFi microwave, and especially again, digital, signals, since 1991-2 in the US, meaning 2G. 1G was ‘analog.’

Keep in mind, then, that long-term exposure and quite probably cumulative effect and latency, as with hospital x-rays and tobacco, are very much in play. Effects occur in living things, whether outwardly felt, seen or not. No one knows what portion of today’s rampant illness is attributable directly and indirectly to the century.25 radiation. These are the serious threats, not “5G” (see WDYM Introduction).

Here in the United Snakes, 5Gmmw is barely breathing, as the WDYM details, and it’s breathing only in selected large cities and associated populous areas – probably it’s final destination for the foreseeable future.

“5G” rollouts in outlying areas are almost certainly 5Gmlb. So it’s quite necessary to know ‘which’ “5G” one is talking about. See section 5G Rollouts in WDYM. BTW, topping out at 8 GHZ, conventional RF powers meters can’t even detect 5Gmmw. So if high levels exist where the “5G” is, they’re MLB/4G.

But we’re here to talk about Geneva.

The map of Switzerland/Geneva you’re about to see shows areas covered by each ‘G’ operating there. To the left of the map is a rectangular box containing a stack of checkboxes. You’ll see the words “Emplacement des antennas” with 5 checkboxes below. There are four ‘G’ boxes, 2G-5G. Start at the bottom one (television) and go up one at a time.

With each box checked, a pattern of colored spots representing emitter locations is superimposed over the previous pattern. Some clever designer decided to make the 5G ones much bigger than the others? Coverage areas coincide pretty well.

The main point here is that we can see enormous telecom radiation saturation of the area, some of which has probably been there since 1992 (2G). But a long-enough time anyway. Then the 3G and 4G layers 2004 to present.

Now, it’s not that 5G can’t cause harm, but so can all the others – each one alone. This is well documented in the scientific literature. When 2G was introduced, after 7-8 years of 1G (sparse deployment) trouble arose almost immediately (cancer), and later, acoustic neuroma (includes hearing loss and ringing in the ears). Widespread concern brought on the 5-year “WTR” investigation that got buried by the industry (see section High-Level Deceit in Wireless Technology: Ultra Convenient. Endlessly Entertaining. Criminally Instigated. Terminally Pathological.

To blame “5G” under Geneva’s conditions is reaching. No one knows people weren’t ‘due’ anyway. Even more of the old radiation could have caused overt symptoms. Moreover, going by symptoms, such as ringing ears and sleep disturbance, it’s equally possible that the 5G set off 4G symptoms being a ‘last straw.’ Possible, because from a physics standpoint, 4G/5G actions on electrical/magnetic biological elements are the same.

All this means there’s no “data point” on which to establish that “5G” alone caused harm. The only valid test would be MMW radiation alone, not in a population otherwise exposed and long sensitized. There were no unexposed citizens that suddenly got sick when it was turned on. As greatly detailed in WDYM, the “Crisis” isn’t “5G” per se, but the Stop 5G! campaign itself — mis-educating people, causing unnecessary stress in many instances, and increasing the overall threat by not telling the whole truth with, “Stop Wireless Technology!”

Here’s the Map. Have fun.


Peter Tocci is a retired massage therapist and wellness consultant with an abiding interest in exploring ‘managed’ history, nefarious covert agendas, and mainstream/mainstream-alternative news-media dereliction, distortion and suppression. He can be reached at [email protected]

© 2020, Peter G Tocci

All Rights Reserved

Subscribe for natural health news to your inbox. Follow Natural Blaze on YouTube, Twitter and Facebook.

Thank you for sharing. Follow us for the latest updates.

Send this to a friend