September vs. 5G: Back to School or Back to The Machine?
Whether children are going back to open school buildings, fitted with 4 & 5G technology, or back to The Machine on their desktops at home, which is now (most likely) outfitted with 4 & 5G technology as well, one must ask: Will there really be much difference?
In specific cases, there will be differences. The option to make alternative choices is still extremely important for every child and family. But on the whole, especially from the health perspective, there is not much difference between spending many hours a day with one’s forehead a foot or so away from a computer screen at home – or at school with a teacher or computer or both, blasted by wireless radiation in a school building. In addition, it is likely that there is radiation in the schoolyard, the neighborhood, the bus to school, and the city, town or rural area around it.
Whether you or your child live in a remote, rural area, a small neighborhood or town, or the middle of a giant city, each and every day – unless rational safety limits are established or safe technology is mandated and installed for public health and not for the profit of a small minority – you will be exposed to constant (and therefore unsafe levels) of non-thermal, non ionizing radiation.
The DSL (Digital Subscriber Line for internet) that runs on overhead, rural telephone lines in much of the U.S. and elsewhere also creates unhealthy electrical fields much of the time, along with data poling and perhaps other new technologies. In addition, installations are often not to code; lines, for example, that should carry a maximum of 15 servers sometimes carry as many as 50, according to workers who have installed them. Enforcement of the code is not done in all rural areas and perhaps not even done in many towns and cities. Further, the codes themselves often do not protect the public health. Along with telephone and power lines, cell towers are now almost everywhere on earth. Wireless broadband in space, as of August 2021, is now expanding in the skies; the immediate future goal is global ubiquity. 4, 5 & 6G are being planned and installed, or already installed in many areas around the world.
The average child today will live an entire life (whether short or long) in a constant soup of polarized (man-made) electromagnetic radiation (EMR) with little or no respite. He or she will be subjected to nanotechnology (which is not currently well understood by most of our population or even our scientists and physicians) as well as seventy or more injected immunization therapies, not all of which will be approved for safety, but implemented under emergency laws, and even a form of global, martial law in which censorship of physicians and scientists is currently rampant. Global martial law, ostensibly for purposes of health and safety, has been economically beneficial to the Wireless Empire and its big brother: Big Tech, which has forced everyone on to their computers and cell phones for hours on end, on a daily basis, much in the same way that other monopolistic megacorporations took over our way of life in the 20th century. (General Motors, Standard Oil of California, Firestone Tire and other car-related industries from the 1930s to 1950 caused many public transportation lines to fail, forcing most of the population to buy automobiles. The resulting pollution and congestion need hardly be described.) Microwave radio frequency pollution, though more invisible, is even more lethal. Since the 1980s or ’90s, we have been subjected to levels a million billion (1,000,000,000,000,000) times stronger than our natural background radiation. This fact cannot be reiterated too frequently considering the repetitive denials of contemporary merchants of doubt. Scientific studies on the health effects abound. To name only a few bibliographies, each containing multiple studies: Ronald N. Kostoff, Ph.D; Dr. Zory Glaser Navy Bibliography More than 3700 references on the biological responses to radio frequency and microwave radiation, published up to May 1976,; EHT Compilation of Peer Reviewed Published Research on Cell Tower Radiation…
The lists go on and on.
Computer models as well as computer use are now dominating not only the lives of adults but also the lives of children. There are many effects that are more than skin-deep, and to cover all of them is an enormous task, so let us just start with the skin. The term “screen dermatitis” was coined in Sweden by scientist, Olle Johansson in the 1980s or so when many people, especially female clerical workers, began working such long hours on computer screens; they were developing skin rashes similar to those over-exposed to sun, x-rays and other forms of radiation, whether it was non-ionizing or ionizing. Many Swedish engineers and workers at Ericsson also experienced screen dermatitis and other effects: damage to the eyes, cataracts from microwave radiation, development of severe light sensitivity, nausea, dizziness and many other health problems that in some cases became permanently disabling. Children are not only vulnerable to these conditions but to many others related to brain development and gestation.
Further, children who have developed extreme electromagnetic sensitivity often endure physical torture when at school or even at home, in addition to bullying and social isolation. Many parents, kids and teachers are not adequately informed by our society in regard to this currently exploding condition. Industry has spent trillions of dollars on public relation campaigns and lobbying, insuring the public that its products are not unsafe. Systemic ridicule of those affected is necessary in order for business to continue as usual. This is not only a crime against humanity but, more specifically, it is a crime against the child who is then often forced to cope with a debilitating condition that is denied by everyone around him. The boy or girl who is punished and shamed for being sick suffers multiple problems alone, including lost time at one’s studies. The irony is that many of the hardest working students (or engineers at Ericsson, for example, as well as the most prolific writers and so on are often the people most vulnerable to developing electromagnetic impairment. This is likely due to excessive computer use, often in a wireless environment).
Many scientists and physicians have written extensively about the effects of wireless technology, cell phones, computers and the emerging technologies that have been clearly shown to be not only carcinogenic but influential in many other health conditions including DNA damage – often denied and censored for the past 3 or 4 decades by telecom tycoons and their merchant-scientists for hire. Telecom-hired scientists with integrity that refused to gloss over the surprisingly disturbing effects of this radiation even decades ago were punished for it and often censored. Many people are now familiar with the stories of scientists like Henry Lai, Jerry Philips and many others.
Oncologists like Dr. Lennart Hardell, have written eloquently and lectured forcefully on the topic of cancer as well as other conditions related to electromagnetic exposures. Hardell has also been an advocate for wired internet in schools instead of wireless systems which substantially raise radiation levels. He also declared Agent Orange a carcinogen many decades ago and seldom makes mistakes. He states that wireless technology should be banned since it has been proven that (industry-influenced) ICNIRP standards do not adequately protect public health.
To name only a few of the other scientists and physicians who have studied the deleterious effects on not only DNA but virtually every mechanism and organ of the body, parents would be wise to become familiar with the work of some of the following: Dr. Henry Lai, Dr. Martin Blank, Dr. Reba Goodman, Dr. Andrew Marino, Dr. Nancy Wertheimer, Dr. Leif Salford, Dr. Magda Havas, Dr. David Carpenter, Dr, Devra Davis, brain surgeon Dr. Charlie Teo , brain surgeon Dr. Keith Black, Dr. Erica Mallory-Blythe, Dr. William Rea, and Dr. Carlos Sosa, who has written one of the first chapters on electromagnetic disease in a standard medical pediatrics text book. These names are made in no particular order and are not names of the only experts in the field.
A few of the advocates who have worked tirelessly for children’s health and safer EMR policies are Executive Director of EHT, Theodora Scarato, Environmental Scientist and founder of EHT, Dr. Devra Davis, Scientist Dr. Martin Blank, Attorney Dafna Tachover, Scientist, MD, Dr. David Carpenter. Oncologist, Dr. Lennart Hardell, Scientist, Dr. Magda Havas, brain surgeon, Dr. Charlie Teo, Physician, Dr. Erica Mallory-Blythe, and neuroscientist, Dr Olle Johansson. Among the many organizations fighting for children’s health and safer technology are Environmental Health Trust (EHT) and Children’s Health Defense CHD). To name just a few of those advocating for EMF safety in general are Physicians for Safe Technology, The People’s Initiative, and We Are The Evidence, This is by no means an exhaustive list. Parents are especially encouraged to do their own research.
Top image credit: momitforward.com