MRNA Inventor Says To Stop COVID “Vaccines” Now
By Neenah Payne
Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of the mRNA technology used in the Pfizer and Moderna COVID shots, was interviewed on June 24 by Del Bigtree, host of The Highwire. Dr. Malone is calling for an immediate halt to the COVID “vaccines”. mRNA VACCINE INVENTOR CALLS FOR STOP OF COVID VAX says,
“Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of the mRNA vaccine, sits down with Del to give his honest concerns about why this is the wrong technology to use against #Covid19 and, in particular, the extreme danger it poses to young people.”
When the scientist who invented the technology warns that it’s not safe to use, why are American universities forcing students to get the shots? Why is the NFL trying to force its players to get these dangerous injections? Why is Fauci planning to force these shots on America’s youth — as young as six months old?! Why are top US banks forcing employees to get these injections? Why are hospitals forcing their staffs to get the jab? Why are states offering incentives to entice the “vaccine hesitant”? Why does Biden want 70% of Americans to get the shot by July 4?
What science are all these institutions following? This article shows that Dr. Malone is not the first doctor or scientist to raise serious concerns about the COVID shots. He follows a number of outstanding people warning that these shots are crippling and killing a record number of Americans. However, Dr. Malone’s position as the inventor of the technology gives his warnings special authority.
The problem we face is that America’s corporate media and Tech Giants are not serving the interests of the American public. They are apparently captives of Big Pharma and have silenced any questions about and opposition to the COVID “health” policies. They claim to be following the dictates of the World Health Organization. However, WHO is now warning against the COVID shots for kids.
Fortunately, 46 percent of unvaccinated say they will definitely not get vaccine. As Lincoln said, “You can fool all of the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.”
Government Is Not Transparent About COVID “Vaccines”
“Robert Malone, MD, is the inventor of mRNA injections and is credited as one of the world’s most foremost experts on the experimental technology currently being used by pharmaceutical companies Pfizer and Moderna. Recently, a video featuring Dr. Malone and his thoughts on these products was deleted from YouTube.”
Think about that. YouTube believes that Americans should not be allowed to know that the inventor of the COVID “vaccine” technology is warning that these shots pose serious risks — especially for America’s youth — and should be stopped immediately. So, whom does YouTube — and all the other Big Tech censors and “Fact Checkers” that suppress vital information — serve? Are they just shills for Big Pharma?
The article adds:
“On June 24, following a recent safety panel meeting of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) admitted to a ‘likely association’ between heart inflammation in young adults and adolescents following the Pfizer and Moderna COVID injection. Following this announcement, the FDA stated it would add a fact sheet warning about this adverse effect – but insisted that the benefits of getting the shot still outweigh the potential risks.
Concerned medical freedom advocates are comparing the FDA’s decision to keep these investigational drugs on the market – despite over 1,200 documented cases of post-jab heart inflammation – to the FDA’s decision back in April 2021 to put a temporary pause on the J&J shot after (an initial) six cases of a rare blood clotting disorder were reported. Now, even the creator of mRNA technology is expressing serious concerns over the safety of these jabs for younger people.
CENSORED: Interview with mRNA inventor over safety concerns for COVID injection deleted from YouTube
Robert Malone, MD, is the inventor of mRNA injections and is credited as one of the world’s most foremost experts on the experimental technology currently being used by pharmaceutical companies Pfizer and Moderna. Recently, a video featuring Dr. Malone and his thoughts on these products was deleted from YouTube. The doctor was later interviewed on June 23 by reporter Tucker Carlson of FOX News. In this interview, Dr. Malone had the chance to reiterate many of his concerns about the FDA’s and CDC’s continued insistence that these injections are worth the risk for young adults.
‘The government is not being transparent with us,’ Dr. Malone says, citing a lack of ‘rigorously’ tested data assessing the known risks of these injections as one of his main objections to young people getting the shots. ‘We don’t have the information we need to make a reasonable decision.’ Dr. Malone goes on to claim that the CDC has not performed appropriate risk-benefit analyses – suggesting that the government’s claim that the benefits outweigh the risks for this young cohort of Americans is simply not based on science.
Regarding whether the shots are truly indicated in younger Americans, the mRNA expert puts it bluntly: ‘I can say that the risk-benefit ratio for those 18 and below doesn’t justify [injections], and there’s a pretty good chance that it doesn’t justify [injection] in these very young adults.’ The swift Big Tech censorship of Dr. Malone and people like him leads to the question: does the propagandized message to ‘follow the science’ only apply to science that supports the pro-jab agenda?”
Why Are No Questions Allowed About COVID “Vaccines”?
The article adds:
“Students take a stand: Young adults around the U.S. prepare to bring suit against universities mandating experimental injections. As of this writing, children as young as 12 can be given the unapproved Pfizer shot in the United States. In some states, including South Carolina, Oregon, Washington, and Tennessee, parental consent for this shot is either not required or can be waived by a doctor.
In his FOX News interview, Dr. Malone points out that ‘people have the right to decide whether to accept [injections] or not, especially since these are experimental [injections]. This is a fundamental right having to do with clinical research ethics.’
In this spirit, thousands of college-aged students from around the country are taking a stand against injection mandates from their academic institutions, including coeds at Indiana University. It’s unfortunate, given that busy college students have other things they should be spending their energy on other than having to advocate for their medical freedoms.”
A number of doctors and scientists are raising very serious concerns about the COVID-19 “vaccines”. Dr. Peter McCullough points out further below that deaths from COVID “vaccines” exceed deaths from all 70 vaccines ever given in the US — and those numbers may represent just 1-10% of the COVID vaccine deaths.
There are now 10,000 “break-through cases” — people who got COVID from the “vaccines”. A growing number of doctors report that the only COVID patients in hospitals now are people who got the “vaccines”. CDC statistics for COVID-19 indicate there is a 99% survival rate for people under age 70. People over 70 can easily survive COVID when treated early with any of the three potential cures. So, while COVID poses little threat, the COVID “health” policies — especially “vaccines” — have caused massive harm to the health and rights of millions of Americans.
Dr. Malone Warns About COVID “Vaccine” Risks
“Fox News commentator Tucker Carlson interviewed Dr. Robert Malone, creator of mRNA vaccine technology, about his opinion that COVID vaccines are unsafe for certain people, and how YouTube censored him for discussing vaccine safety.”
Dr. Malone said:
“‘Government Not Being Transparent’ About Vaccine Risks.” Dr. Robert Malone told Tucker Carlson we know the vaccines pose risks, but it’s hard to assess them because the government isn’t capturing the data ‘rigorously enough,’ so we don’t have the information we need to make a reasonable decision. ‘Normally, at this stage, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunizations Practices would’ve performed those risk-benefit analyses,” said Malone. ‘They would be data-based and science-based. They’re not right now.'”
The article reports:
“YouTube took down an episode of the Dark Horse Podcast that featured an interview with Malone, despite Malone likely being ‘the single most qualified person on the planet’ to discuss vaccine risks, Carlson explained. ‘He helped create the mRNA technology used in COVID vaccines.’
Malone told Carlson he’s concerned about vaccine safety in young people who are at low risk of becoming seriously ill or dying from COVID. Malone told Carlson: “One of my concerns is the government is not being transparent with us. I’m of the opinion that people have the right to decide whether to accept vaccines or not, especially since these are experimental vaccines. This is a fundamental right having to do with clinical research ethics.”
Why Isn’t Dr. Malone’s Warning Headline News?
“The inventor of mRNA tech is sounding the alarm. So why isn’t this headline news?”
COVID Shots Killing Large Numbers of People
World Renowned Conventional Doc Blasts The COVID JAB-Erwocks links to an interview with Dr. Peter McCullough, Vice Chief of Internal Medicine, Baylor University Medical Center.
W.H.O. Says Don’t Vaccinate Kids
The article says:
“…since the beginning of the pandemic, key pieces of medical guidance from the World Health Organization have proven to be disastrously false — false enough to cost lives….It was the W.H.O. that worked in stealth with the Chinese government to obscure the source of the outbreak at the very beginning and then hide its origins from the world….For more than a year, the tech monopolies of Silicon Valley have used the World Health Organization’s official statements to determine what American news consumers are allowed to know and what they should be prohibited from knowing about COVID.
Facebook even announced a formal partnership with the W.H.O., quote ‘To bring up to date and accurate information to billions of people.’ So, that partnership between a China-controlled NGO, the World Health Organization and the China beholden tech platforms in this country continued smoothly until just a few days ago. That’s when the bureaucrats at the World Health Organization published new vaccine guidance.
Here’s what it says: children should not take the coronavirus vaccine. Why? Because the drugs are too dangerous. There’s not nearly enough data to understand their long-term effects or to show that the benefits of the drugs are worth the risks they bring. This is terrible news, of course, for the pharmaceutical industry. Big Pharma has been planning to test the vaccine on six-month-olds. It’s deeply embarrassing for much of the American news media, which have taken a quick break from ginning up hysteria about Russian spies to sell vaccines to their viewers, which they have been assiduously doing in case you haven’t noticed. And above all, it is a shocking repudiation of the American health establishment, which has been relentlessly pushing universal vaccination including for children.”
WSJ Warns About COVID Shots
“There are concerning trends on blood clots and low platelets, not that the authorities will tell you.”
It points out:
“One remarkable aspect of the Covid-19 pandemic has been how often unpopular scientific ideas, from the lab-leak theory to the efficacy of masks, were initially dismissed, even ridiculed, only to resurface later in mainstream thinking. Differences of opinion have sometimes been rooted in disagreement over the underlying science. But the more common motivation has been political.
Another reversal in thinking may be imminent. Some scientists have raised concerns that the safety risks of Covid-19 vaccines have been underestimated. But the politics of vaccination has relegated their concerns to the outskirts of scientific thinking—for now.”
“Nonetheless, the large clustering of certain adverse events immediately after vaccination is concerning, and the silence around these potential signals of harm reflects the politics surrounding Covid-19 vaccines. Stigmatizing such concerns is bad for scientific integrity and could harm patients.
Four serious adverse events follow this arc, according to data taken directly from Vaers: low platelets (thrombocytopenia); noninfectious myocarditis, or heart inflammation, especially for those under 30; deep-vein thrombosis; and death. Vaers records 321 cases of myocarditis within five days of receiving a vaccination, falling to almost zero by 10 days. Prior research has shown that only a fraction of adverse events are reported, so the true number of cases is almost certainly higher. This tendency of underreporting is consistent with our clinical experience.
Analyses to confirm or dismiss these findings should be performed using large data sets of health-insurance companies and healthcare organizations. The CDC and FDA are surely aware of these data patterns, yet neither agency has acknowledged the trend. The implication is that the risks of a Covid-19 vaccine may outweigh the benefits for certain low-risk populations, such as children, young adults and people who have recovered from Covid-19. This is especially true in regions with low levels of community spread, since the likelihood of illness depends on exposure risk.”
Politics Controls COVID Policies
“And while you would never know it from listening to public-health officials, not a single published study has demonstrated that patients with a prior infection benefit from Covid-19 vaccination. That this isn’t readily acknowledged by the CDC or Anthony Fauci is an indication of how deeply entangled pandemic politics is in science.
There are, however, signs of life for scientific honesty. In May, the Norwegian Medicines Agency reviewed case files for the first 100 reported deaths of nursing-home residents who received the Pfizer vaccine. The agency concluded that the vaccine “likely” contributed to the deaths of 10 of these residents through side effects such as fever and diarrhea, and “possibly” contributed to the deaths of an additional 26. But this type of honesty is rare. And it is rare for any vaccine to be linked to deaths, so this unusual development for mRNA vaccines merits further investigation.
The battle to recover scientific honesty will be an uphill one in the U.S. Anti-Trump politics in the spring of 2020 mushroomed into social-media censorship. News reporting often lacked intellectual curiosity about the appropriateness of public-health guidelines—or why a vocal minority of scientists strongly disagreed with prevailing opinions.”
“Evidence that the coronavirus may have escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology catches up to Fauci and other Wuhan Covid deniers, despite suspicious facts that have been apparent from the start.”
Neenah Payne writes for Natural Blaze and Activist Post