They’re trying to change history—don’t let them. In the chaotic atmosphere of 2020, the Wayback Machine is a crucial resource in the fight against disinformation. —Brewster Kahle, Founder, Internet Archive

A New Timeline

Image by Stefan Keller

What if one day you woke up and discovered that nothing is as it seems. Everything is reversed. Chemicals that once were shown to cause cancer are now being sprayed in drinking water and injected as ‘medicine.’ Established scientific concepts have been redefined to mean the opposite of what you once learned. From viruses to antibodies, immunity to death, established scientific definitions have been manipulated under the pen of change agents. You might wonder if you are living in a new timeline.

And  you just might be. You might even feel like a kid again because you have to relearn how to use a language that has changed overnight, while you slept.

Redefining Quarantine:

Old Webster’s definition of Quarantine: Enforced isolation of patients suffering from a contagious disease in order to prevent the spread of disease:

New CDC definition of Quarantine:  Quarantine is used to keep someone who might have been exposed to COVID-19 away from others. Quarantine helps prevent spread of disease that can occur before a person knows they are sick or if they are infected with the virus without feeling symptoms.

Without fanfare or publicity, the WHO’s website features new definitions under ‘Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Serology, antibodies and immunity.’

Widget not in any sidebars

Redefining Antibodies:

The WHO warns, there is “no evidence antibody tests can show coronavirus immunity.”

Doctors say, “Coronavirus antibodies do NOT guarantee immunity.”

Experts claim, “antibodies may provide protection against reinfections even if they wane over time.”

A UK professor and disease expert claims, “herd immunity against coronavirus won’t happen until next summer.”

A new report says,  “coronavirus immunity could last years, maybe even decades.”

Everyone has an opinion.

However, a 2012 report in the Journal Immunity said, “antibodies are not required for antiviral immunity.” From the research:

Our findings contradict the current view that antibodies are absolutely required to survive infection with viruses… and establish an unexpected function for B cells as custodians of macrophages in antiviral immunity.” – Dr. von Andrian, [Moseman et al.: “B Cell Maintenance of Subcapsular Sinus Macrophages Protects against a Fatal Viral Infection Independent of Adaptive Immunity.”]

In 2012, the authors observation led them to rethink the contribution of adaptive immune responses to survival following  an infection. They concluded that antibodies from B cells, alone, were not necessary for survival. From a March 2012 article in Science Daily:

The immune system has two main branches or poles, innate immunity and adaptive immunity. Innate immunity is a first line of defense that relies on cells and mechanisms that provide non-specific immunity. The more sophisticated adaptive immunity, which counts antibody-producing B cells as part of its arsenal, is thought to play a major role in the specific response to viral infections in mammals. However, adaptive immune responses require time to become fully mobilized.

This 2012 research marks a definitive marker in established science on immunity and the human body. Since 2012, the W.H.O has changed the definition of herd immunity to eliminate pre-COVID science about natural immunity. According to the W.H.O., Herd Immunity comes solely from vaccines.

Redefining Herd Immunity:

The original W.H.O definition states that herd immunity “happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection. This means that even people who haven’t been infected, or in whom an infection hasn’t triggered an immune response, they are protected because people around them who are immune can act as buffers between them and an infected person.”

The New W.H.O definition:  “‘Herd immunity’ exists when a high percentage of the population is vaccinated.”

However, just because “the experts,”  or W.H.O, has an opinion on science, does not change science. Science is still, and always will be, debatable. Everyone still has a right to an opinion. So everyone still has a choice.

Real Herd Immunity

Image by AlkeMade

Every individual must have an opinion since true herd immunity is expressed first through individuals, similar to how the health of a forest is protected by the health of its individual trees.

Real Herd Immunity happens when a certain percentage of the population acquires the disease naturally, which then protects the entire ‘herd’ from disease. The natural infection process creates life-long immunity, vs. vaccines, which provides only for short term, if any, immunity. For instance, as people express the symptoms of natural Chicken pox as children, that infection further protects the individual, later in life, against the development of Shingles and its increased risk of complications. The same holds true for all known infections.

Vaccines do not always produce antibodies, or seroconversion. And because most people are not checked, no one knows how many recipients seroconvert.  A 2012 study showed that mothers who naturally acquire infections as children—measles, mumps, Rubella—are protected against allergies, fatal heart attacks and strokes, as well as certain cancers later in life. These mothers pass natural antibodies on to their children who are protected for the first two years until their immune systems are capable of handling the infections, themselves.

In mothers who are vaccinated, their natural antibodies are suppressed in favor of the vaccine-induced antibodies that do not provide long-term immunity and are not passed on to their children.  In the case of pertussis, the mutated virus in a vaccine is not silenced but transformed. The vaccine sheds the virus to spread the disease among the population. Read more about Vaccines, The Death of Natural Immunity.

Outbreaks in Highly Vaccinated Herds

Before the COVID narrative, the logic that herd immunity was obtained through vaccination had been falling apart with each new outbreak in highly vaccinated herds. This is because vaccines contain toxins that congest the blood and stay in the body to cause damage. Some toxins include aluminum salts (adjuvants), formaldehyde (carcinogen), bovine protein, and polysorbate 80, an additive never to be injected since it carries toxins across the blood brain barrier. These toxins are linked to GI problems, heart attacks, strokes, autoimmune diseases, and tumor growth.

Before the timeline shift, the vaccine package insert of Tripedia DTaP vaccine by Sanofi Pasteur reported, “Adverse events reported during post-approval use of Tripedia vaccine include idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, SIDS, anaphylactic reaction, cellulitis, autism, convulsion/grand mal convulsion, encephalopathia, hypotonia, neuropathy, somnolence and apnea.”

Before the new narrative on immunity, the wild strain of pertussis bacterium had mutated into a more virulent form from the vaccine. Both forms spread around the world and appeared to have similar virulence, which not only negated the effectiveness of the vaccine program, but also increased the risk of seizures and other adverse reactions, noted on the package insert. The evidence was reported in the Journal Clin Microbiol Infect. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03925.x, which is still viewable in the new timeline.

NanoVaccine Tech

Also viewable in the new timeline is a study conducted by Italian scientists, and husband and wife team, Antonietta M. Gatti and Stefano Montanari, who published their research in the 2017 International Journal of Vaccines & Vaccination. They investigated 44 common vaccines, looking for nanoparticles not listed on the label. And they found that all 44 contained nanoparticles of aluminum, titanium, tungsten, silicon, calcium, lead, stainless steel, cadmium, zinc, iron, iron alloys and other contaminants in various complexes:

“…the particles are surrounded and embedded in a biological substrate. In all the samples analyzed, we identified particles containing: Lead (Typhym, Cervarix, Agrippal S1, Meningitec, Gardasil) or stainless steel (Mencevax, Infarix Hexa, Cervarix. Anatetall, Focetria, Agrippal S1, Menveo, Prevenar 13, Meningitec, Vaxigrip, Stamaril Pasteur, Repevax and MMRvaxPro).”

“Given the contaminations we observed in all samples of human-use vaccines, adverse effects after the injection of those vaccines are possible and credible and have the character of randomness, since they depend on where the contaminants are carried by the blood circulation.”

“As happens with all foreign bodies, particularly that small, they induce an inflammatory reaction that is chronic because most of those particles cannot be degraded. Furthermore, the protein-corona effect…due to a nano-bio-interaction…can produce organic/inorganic composite particles capable of stimulating the immune system in an undesirable way…It is impossible not to add that particles the size often observed in vaccines can enter cell nuclei and interact with the DNA…”

Since 2017, other journals have reported on new vaccine nanotechnology. The November 2019 journal Frontiers in Immunology: “Nanoparticle Vaccines Against Infectious Diseases”  describes “bio-designed NPs utilizing a bacterial expression system and the capacity of RNA molecules to act as chaperones.” Note: COVID Vaccines are experimental mRNA vaccine technology known to alter DNA.

The January 2019 journal Frontiers in Immunology: “Nanoparticle-Based Vaccines Against Respiratory Viruses” reveals a new generation of vaccines based on nanoparticles has shown great potential to address most of the limitations of conventional and subunit vaccines. This is due to recent advances in chemical and biological engineering, which allow the design of nanoparticles with a precise control over the size, shape, functionality and surface properties, leading to enhanced antigen presentation and strong immunogenicity.”

For more on nanobots, read Designer Nanobots Changing Humanity.

The Case For Sanitation and Hygiene

What appears to be missing from the new lexicon of definitions?  The boatload of science on hygiene food, nutrition, and health.

Science has appeared to have lost the data on the reason surgeons wash their hands before a surgery or why clean water and nutrition is important for a healthy body.

Fortunately, you can still find a copy of an editorial from the December 1999 Journal of Pediatrics, documented “the largest historical decrease in morbidity and mortality caused by infectious disease was experienced not with modern antibiotics and vaccines, but after the introduction of clean water and effective sewer systems.”

In the February 2002 Journal Lancet Infectious Diseases evidence for a causal link between hygiene and infections was proven. Using raw data from the 1900s, overall mortality from infectious disease had declined to negligible levels long before the introduction of widespread vaccination practices.

A 2012 Polish report concluded that, despite the claim for the need of vaccination, there are now strong reasons to argue against it. Results were  graphed to show the pertussis, or whooping cough, mortality rate from 1838 to 1976 in England/Wales maintained the same downward trend before and after the time vaccines were implemented.

For centuries, many doctors have known that data has been manipulated. Many have been a part of the manipulation through conditioning. However, many others have spoken out against false narratives, such as the Germ Theory that argues for chemical injections. However, more than ever before, those who do speak out are often censored, their information suppressed, and their jobs terminated.

Information is still accessible from the previous timeline and must be refreshed lest we end up forgetting past experiences.

There does not exist one single fact, in all the experiments and improvements made in science, which can support the idea of vaccination. A vaccinated people will always be a sickly people, short lived and degenerate.” — Dr. Alexander Wilder, MD, “Vaccination: A Medical Fallacy,” editor of the New York Medical Tribune, 1879.

Cancer is reported to be increasing not only in England and the Continent, but in all parts of the world where vaccination is practised.” —Dr. William S. Tebb, MA, MD, DPH, “The Increase of Cancer”, 1892

The great epidemics of deadly diseases, in animals and mankind, are caused by vaccination. — Charles M. Higgins, “The Horrors of Vaccination: Exposed and Illustrated”, 1920

In a Post-COVID timeline, should those in the herd who choose to vaccinate with a new experimental mRNA COVID vaccine fear those who choose not to vaccinate? After all, if the vaccines work, what’s the problem?

In the new timeline, Herd Immunity is called “Community Immunity” and “Population Immunity,” concepts used solely for vaccines. The WHO website states:

“….in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached.”

“Herd immunity is achieved by protecting people from a virus, not by exposing them to it.”

Why mention exposure to a virus if you want to eliminate the idea that natural viral infections are part of real herd immunity?  Why make people ask if vaccination exposes the recipient, through injection, to the virus’ genetic material?

Finding Truth

The world did not end in 2012, according to the Mayan calendar, as many predicted. But perhaps one timeline ended and a new one began. There are many signs and indications of a timeline shift, including the phenomenon called the Mandela Effect, named after Nelson Mandela. Many dates, events, and people are misremembered in history, causing some to question the fabric of reality.

When definitions change at the whim of a select group of narrators, it is up to the audience, which is referred to as “the herd,” to question what is happening. Every narrative is a test of humanity, especially now as new definitions replace established ones.

The new narrative has redefined “Influenza” as “COVID,” to claim that COVID19 death rates have suddenly risen in the U.S. and around the world, while ignoring influenza deaths. The evidence is reported in the CDC archives for any who can find it. And the truth that COVID-19 had has had “relatively no effect on deaths” in the U.S. was published by a reputable University, and then retracted, for none to find it. Under the new narrative, natural health websites are missing in action.

You may not be able to change planned world events as they play out, but you can change how you respond to them. Amidst overt changes to the meanings of words, underlying truths remains unchanged. Truth, like other intangibles, is embodied. Your body’s innate immune system knows the truth because it manifests truth as health or dis-ease based on your choices, from the foods you eat, to the thoughts you think.

Yesterday I was clever, so I wanted to change the world. Today I am wise, so I am changing myself.― Rumi

You may not change the world, but you can change the world you occupy. Are you a herd animal or do you think for yourself?

You already know the consequences of toxic exposures. A healthy mind can guide you to know what to allow in and what to keep out of your body. A healthy mind can guide you to question the narrators. Knowing history can stop you from repeating it.

In 1915, another medical doctor wrote an article for the top British medical journal Lancet. Dr. Montais studied 21 cases of tetanus, each of whom had received Pasteurian inoculation. The conclusion of the article, which appeared in the 23 Oct 1915 issue, was that in every case, the tetanus had been caused by the inoculation. Dr. Montais said that “Pasteur had created a new form of disease.— Tim O’Shea, The Post-Antibiotic Age: Germ Theory

There has never been a single vaccine in this country [the USA] that has ever been submitted to a controlled scientific study. They never took a group of 100 people who were candidates for a vaccine, gave 50 of them a vaccine and left the other 50 alone to measure the outcome. And since that hasn’t been done, that means that if you want to be kind, you will call vaccines an unproven remedy. If you want to be accurate, you’ll call people who give vaccines ‘quacks’. — Robert Mendelsohn, MD

What type of science attempts to replace your innate immune system with nanotechnology and call it herd immunity?

The same science that would exchange herd immunity for herd mentality. All science must be questioned and challenged as we  move forward in this timeline. There is no going back. And why would anyone choose to?

Americans need to be prepared for the possibility that they may feel a little unwell after they get a coronavirus vaccine, if one is authorized. – CDC Committee, November 23, 2020