Forced Vaccination by the Medical Mafia or Informed Choice?

April 21, 2020April 21, 2020Vaccines

Total4
0
4
0
Like

Share via

In the next 18 months, we could see an attempt at forced vaccination. You may not have much of a choice. Is this what you want? I certainly don’t.

And even worse, one may need a digital certificate that proves you have been vaccinated or you may not be allowed to renew a driver’s license or participate in many other public activities.

We need to rethink germ theory (I need to be afraid of and do something about bogeyman pathogens) and return to terrain theory (I need to take care of my body and be truly healthy). Terrain theory assumes responsibility for the environment in which pathogens can survive but thrive. Terrain theory is a movement towards taking full responsibility for the health or conditions we create in our bodies. A truly healthy terrain equals far less disease and health issues. Chinese medicine takes the side of terrain theory and personal responsibility. Western medicine large takes the side of germ theory and using drugs to simply manage issues, not getting to their root or encouraging people to deal with their diet, lifestyle and emotional factors.

We have been programmed to believe that pathogens are all out to get us and the ONLY solution offered by the mainstream media is a vaccine.

Widget not in any sidebars

We also have been led to believe that vaccines are what lowered infection rates with regards to polio, measles, mumps, smallpox and other pathogenic diseases. But, it this really true? Could there be other reasons for the decline of such health issues? How would you know? You certainly have never been told this by the media or medical doctors.

Check out this website here to get the other side of the issue with regards to vaccines. This site outlines the other factors that were far more influential in stopping the spreading of acute infectious disease.

Let’s take a look at the massive downside of vaccines as it relates to autism. But this doesn’t just apply to autism, because a massive amount of other health issues can stem from damage caused by vaccines in the short and long run including by not limited to allergic reactions and increased allergies, malformations, auto-immune conditions, inflammatory responses, Well’s syndrome, developmental delay, and neurodevelopmental disorders, including tics, speech delay, language delay, attention deficit disorder, and many more.

In 1970 only 1 in 10,000 developed autism.

By 2020, it is 1 in 59, with some stating it might be as high as 1 in 35.

In 1950, 14 doses of 5 vaccines were given. Now, in 2020, 70 doses of 16 vaccines are administered.

Vaccines contain known poisons including Thimerisol (mercury), aluminum, aborted fetal cells, formaldehyde, and other toxic ingredients.

I understand that one cannot just simply say that vaccines are the direct cause of autism. But, why the exponential increase in autism in the last 60 years?! Other dietary and environmental factors exist. But, contrary to what you may have heard, the evidence is compelling, especially when the testing is not done by BigPharma. See for yourself below in the most trusted database for science-based medicine (Pubmed).

With regards to the flu vaccine, when the research has not been done by Big Pharma, the effectiveness is almost zero.

In 2012, a report was made by the Center for Infectious Disease and Policy noted a couple of interesting findings:

Flu vaccines protection overall is “suboptimal,” especially when considering those over the age of 65 are most at risk. For this group, “a paucity (scarcity) of evidence for protection” exists. Moderate protection was noted for adults and high protection was noted for children. This should be normal as children and adults have overall better immunity as it is. A vaccine wouldn’t necessarily affect this.
They also noted that “A major barrier to the development of game-changing influenza vaccines is the perception that current vaccines are already highly effective in preventing influenza infection.” This highlights how current vaccines are not highly effective in preventing influenza.
“In an effort to reduce influenza morbidity and mortality, over the last three decades the ACIP has expanded the populations recommended to receive influenza vaccine. These recommendations, however, often were based on professional judgment and not on scientifically sound data.” This means that the scientific data does not support evidence for the vaccines being effective and recommendations are based largely on professional opinion.

EMF Summit Still Available for a Limited Time - Content, Bonuses and More.

The Cochrane Collaboration, which is an independent (non-Big Pharma funded) group that looks objectively at the data, noted the following in their review of the available data,

We have conducted four reviews since the late 1990s. We calculated that you need to vaccinate between 33 and 99 people to prevent a single case of flu, depending on the match between the vaccine and the circulating strains of the virus. I want people held accountable for wasting taxpayers’ money on these vaccines. The reviews have been available for years and nothing has been done.

So to put this into perspective, you may have to vaccinate 99 people before it works. This is a potential 1%-3% efficacy. We are telling everyone to get vaccinated for the flu shot because it works in 1% of people?! It is tough to justify a flu shot when, statistically, protection afforded by the shot is not very high.

They went on to say,

An earlier systematic review of 274 influenza vaccine studies published up to 2007 found industry-funded studies were published in more prestigious journals and cited more than other studies independently from methodological quality and size. Studies funded from public sources were significantly less likely to report conclusions favorable to the vaccines. The review showed that reliable evidence on influenza vaccines is thin but there is evidence of widespread manipulation of conclusions and spurious notoriety of the studies. The content and conclusions of this review should be interpreted in light of this finding.

What this means is that studies funded by pharmaceutical companies are potentially manipulated and skewed. It is well known that when studies are done that don’t support the vaccine, the pharmaceutical companies simply don’t publish them. Public sources don’t show favorable conclusions to flu vaccines. Another review of the data for the flu vaccine protecting the elderly found that “evidence is of poor quality regarding safety, efficacy, and effectiveness.” The same conclusion was reached in this review with regards to Tamiflu, which is commonly given to people when they get the flu. Tamiflu may show little to no benefit for efficacy against the flu.

In the above study, it is noted that it takes years and more than 1 billion dollars in research to make a flu vaccine. This is a lot of money spent on a vaccine that, so far, isn’t supported with evidence. Imagine if we used this amount of money to do things to strengthen the immune system that worked in harmony with nature.

Do you think that the efficacy of a rushed and untested Covid-19 (coronavirus) vaccine will be any more effective?

Or, should you abstain from immune compromising foods (GMO refined sugar, GMO wheat, GMO corn, GMO soy, GMO canola (fried food), dairy products, alcohol, pork and artificial sweeteners), exercise regularly, get adequate sun, detoxify regularly, take scientifically-backed immune-boosting substances and relieve stress through meditation?

Isn’t it logical to assume the above health practices will have much greater efficacy against getting sick than a 1-3% potential efficacy with a Covid-19 vaccine?

Who is going to do the testing for the coronavirus vaccine? It surely will not be an independent, non-Big Pharma funded initiative.

This might sound dangerous, illogical, highly uncompassionate, stupid or unscientific to some, but what about herd immunity? When someone got chickenpox back in the day, we had a chickenpox party. The point was to expose children to the virus so that the body could develop its own antibodies naturally. If people are truly healthy, I fully support this way of dealing with the coronavirus. I want to be exposed to it because I know that I am healthy and my body will develop antibodies naturally. I don’t want or need a vaccine.

Despite people’s overreactions and shaming those of us that believe in solutions other than what the mainstream media, government and pharmaceutical companies suggest, it does not mean this is not loving or compassionate. Those with pre-existing conditions need to be highly incentivized to get healthy (because most disease is reversible with the right diet and lifestyle interventions) and take their own precautions in the face of exposure to any virus now or in the future. The answer is not shutting down society, cowering in fear and waiting for Bill Gates to save us with a vaccine. The pathway forward has been and will continue to be one of personal responsibility. But, even then, it is very hard to FORCE personal responsibility on anyone.

Here is one crazy solution for starters. With regards to refined sugar, we could stop subsidies (yes, the government gives money to sugar producers to keep the cost of sugar low) of this toxic, disease-causing substance and increase the price from 2 dollars per pound to 40 dollars per pound, making it very hard to afford. Wouldn’t that be compassionate for diabetics, cancer patients and those with hypertension and other heart issues, knowing that sugar is the main cause (or one of) of those issues? Those health issues kill MILLIONS of people every year in the USA.

Another interesting factor is that we only have access to numbers of reported cases of the coronavirus. If there was an objective way to test everyone in the USA (the testing is being done now is FAR from objective), I suspect that millions of people already have been exposed to and have already developed immunity to this virus. In those cases, what would we need a vaccine for?

The solution to this plandemic is not a quarantine for everyone (perhaps just for the most vulnerable), shutting everything down and vaccines. It is personal responsibility and building strong immunity from within. That is the solution. The solution is embracing non-pharmaceutical interventions that work. I healed entirely from an autoimmune condition (which still isn’t possible from a Western medical perspective despite loads of science-backed evidence). I only healed because I have taken radical responsibility for my own health. This is the path forward. Anything other than this will fail in the long run and cost us millions of more lives and tons more money. Taking personal responsibility is the hardest thing I have ever done, but I wouldn’t trade it for the world.

Source: Triune Wellness Center

Dr. Scott can help you to address the physical, mental, emotional and spiritual factors that are playing a role in why you have a health problem or disease. Much of his training was in diet/nutrition, however, his specialty is working with the emotional roots of disease. He uses a variety of different methods t0 help people including Chinese medicine (acupuncture, herbs, tuina, cupping), NRT – Nutrition Response Testing, NAET – Allergy Elimination, Body Talk, Faster EFT, EFT – Emotional Freedom Techniques, The Sedona Method, Mental Field Therapy, Pranic Healing, Quantum Touch, Psychokisiology and the Emotion Code.

Subscribe for natural health news to your inbox. Follow Natural Blaze on YouTube, Twitter and Facebook.