Why Are Aggressive Brain Tumors On The Rise In England? How About USA?
“We found a sustained and highly significant increase in GBM throughout the 21 years and across all ages,” said Alasdair Philips, the lead author of the study, which has just been released online by the peer-reviewed, open access, Journal of Environmental and Public Health.
In the Journal of Environmental and Public Health published online March 21, 2018 the Results indicate:
We report a sustained and highly statistically significant ASR rise in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) across all ages. The ASR for GBM more than doubled from 2.4 to 5.0, with annual case numbers rising from 983 to 2531. Overall, this rise is mostly hidden in the overall data by a reduced incidence of lower grade tumours.
Furthermore, the study Conclusion states:
The rise is of importance for clinical resources and brain tumour aetiology. The rise cannot be fully accounted for by promotion of lower–grade tumours, random chance or improvement in diagnostic techniques as it affects specific areas of the brain and only one type of brain tumour. Despite the large variation in case numbers by age, the percentage rise is similar across the age groups which suggests widespread environmental or lifestyle factors may be responsible.
Those “widespread environmental or lifestyle factors,” which need to be examined thoroughly for pseudoscience and deliberately missing factual science, in this writer’s opinion, result from the ubiquitous presence of cell phone, stingray, and other microwave towers, arrays and antennas, plus the inordinate ‘use’ of cell phones and other technologies using Gigahertz ranges of microwaves to receive, send, and store all types of silly information no one ever would have thought about a generation ago!
Computer games and other high tech gismos are to blame ONLY if humans use them, which they do to the point of becoming addicted to technology. We know what drug and controlled substance addictions do to human organism, well, step back and realize what high tech addition will do: brain cancers, as is being confirmed by scientific studies!
According to the researchers in the above paper,
Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM), the most common and most malignant primary tumour of the brain, is associated with one of the worst five–year survival rates among all human cancers, with an average survival from diagnosis of only about 1 year. [CJF emphasis]
That’s nothing new! The IARC of the World Health Organization, back in May 2011, issued a press release stating,
PRESS RELEASE N° 208 31 May 2011
IARC CLASSIFIES RADIOFREQUENCY ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS AS
POSSIBLY CARCINOGENIC TO HUMANS
Lyon, France, May 31, 2011 ‐‐ The WHO/International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B), based on an increased risk for glioma, a malignant type of brain cancer1, associated with wireless phone use. [ http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/pr/2011/pdfs/pr208_E.pdf ] [CJF emphasis]
Why are public health agencies and state public utility commissions NOT doing something to collar the unprecedented takeover by the microwave technology sector for polluting the environment with “electrosmog”?
That industry deliberately has been misleading the public since the early days of radar research in stating there are only thermal (heat) effects, whereas independent research and even microwave industry research acknowledges non-thermal radiation waves, including their adverse health effects.
Dr. Henry Lai, PhD, of the University of Washington, found in his “Radiofrequency Research: Does Funding Matter” that apparent “Industry” biases DO exist, even to the point of not reporting the results for consumers to take into consideration:
Harmful Effect ……….. 70%
No Effect ……………….. 30%
Harmful Effect ………. 32%
No Effects ……………… 68%
For the microwave industry professional associations, such as ICNIRP, not to acknowledge 32% of harmful effects from radiofrequencies, that apparently amounts to FRAUDULENT science reporting, and ICNIRP’s standing as a professional association should be discredited before the World Health Organization and other reputable health agencies, in this writer’s opinion. Here is “Non-thermal Biological Effects of Microwaves.”
Non-thermal adverse health effects result from ALL types of microwave-generated technologies, including AMI Smart Meters, baby monitors, cell phones of any genre, Wi-Fi and all those satellites in the sky bombarding us with microwave radiation! What will 5G do to humans, the environment and all life forms on earth?
Where are the rat studies and environmental impact studies for 5G?
5G should not be implemented until all those studies are done, released and properly vetted by scientists on both sides of the thermal versus non-thermal health issues.
Basically, the FCC takes NO responsibility for the science? Why? It depends upon private and semi-private organizations and industrial professional societies, e.g., IEEE, the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), the National Council on Radiation Protection (NCRP), and the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) for input that counters academic and independent EMF/RF research for years going back to the 1930s when non-ionizing radiation adverse health effects were first reported.
Are other countries, including the USA, experiencing similar GBMs?
MicroWave News reports the following:
What’s Going On in the U.S.?
Increases in GBM have previously been seen in other countries, notably in the Netherlands (see our story from 2016). And there has been some anecdotal support from Denmark: In 2012, the Danish Cancer Society reported a spike in GBMs. The Society quoted a neuro-oncologist at Copenhagen University Hospital as saying that this was a “frightening development.” That news advisory was later removed from the society’s website. (See our “Something Rotten in Denmark.”)
In 2012, a group at the University of Southern California reported an increase in GBM in the frontal and temporal lobes in the U.S. But, a more recent analysis by the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States did not show a rise in GBM from 2000-2014 (Fig. 25). The CBTRUS study did not look at tumor location. Why there would be a difference in the incidence of GBM between England and America is not clear.
We asked David Carpenter, a neurophysiologist by training and the director of the Institute for Health and the Environment in Albany, NY, for a comment. “This appears to be the evidence that has been predicted from all the recent case-control studies showing an association between cell phone use and brain cancer,” he told us. “The question now is whether we’ll see this same trend in the American population.”
Joel Moskowitz of the Berkeley School of Public Health agrees that the issue needs more attention. “Those who cite statistics that appear to show a flat-line trend in overall brain tumor incidence and argue that cell phone use doesn’t cause brain cancer need to examine data on the location and type of brain tumors over time,” he said.
The above information indicates a global “phenomenon,” not an anomaly! It’s time the U.S. Federal Communication Commission, Health and Human Services, the EPA, and the U.S. Congress WAKE up to what’s going on and stop the new “pandemic”!
It’s truly shameful, and possibly criminal, we have the current pandemic of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) affecting one in 42 boys in the USA [one in 68 statistically for USA], with other countries reporting the following statistics:
Japan: 161 cases per 10,000 children studied
UK-England: 94 cases per 10,000 children studied
Sweden: 72 cases per 10,000 children studied
Denmark: 68 cases per 10,000 children studied
USA: 66 cases per 10,000 children studied
Canada: 65 cases per 10,000 children studied
Australia: 45 cases per 10,000 children studied
Brazil: 27 cases per 10,000 children studied
Hong Kong, SAR of China: 17 cases per children studied
Both electromagnetic frequencies like microwaves and other man-made EMPs/RFs/ELFs plus neurotoxic chemicals and heavy metals, which are administered to newborns, infants, toddlers, teens, adults and senior citizens cause BRAIN anomalies, especially from chemicals designed to take vaccines across the Blood Brain Barrier (BBB), are causing serious brain health problems no one wants to address.
Humans cannot be made sick by the whims of irresponsible technology and vested interests in lobbying for laws to be enacted, or otherwise, enabling their making huge profits, e.g., Big Pharma and vaccine makers, including possible mind control issues leading toward transhumanism and artificial intelligence.
Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.
Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.
Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.
Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)