Agnotology in Vaccine Problems — Non-Placebo Placebos
Agnotology = ‘Culturally induced ignorance by the publication of inaccurate or misleading scientific data’
The biggest and most disgusting agnotology problem with so-called science that is relied on for safety in vaccines, is that in most of the human trials, the new vaccine is tested against what is nearly a whole other vaccine! New vaccines are not tested against the usual placebo of saline. By not using an inert substance for a placebo, that is violating the baseline of ‘nothing’ in their research studies.
With the MMR for example, a major study was done in Finland (1986) with 581 sets of twins. This double blind placebo study tested the reactions from the combined MMR vaccine. This study is relied on by the Australian government as ‘evidence’ that the MMR vaccine is safe. The results looked good, IF you skip over what the placebo actually was. The so-called “placebo” group received “the same product including neomycin and phenol-red indicator but without the viral antigens”, i.e.
The ‘placebo’ group received a product with neomycin, sorbitol and hydrolysed gelatine, Medium 199 (vitamins, amino acids, foetal bovine serum, sucrose, glutamate), Minimum Essential Medium, phosphate, recombinant human albumin, chick embryo cell culture and WI-38 human diploid lung fibroblasts. Let’s pull that statement apart to see what they meant and exactly what that placebo was. Firstly “…the same product” We are talking about the MMR vaccine being used as the placebo, but “without the viral antigens.” Let’s then look at the other ingredients in the MMR that were administered in the ‘placebo.’
- Live attenuated rubella virus propagated in WI-38 human diploid lung fibroblasts (WI-38 is a diploid human cell culture line composed of fibroblasts derived from lung tissue of an aborted Caucasian human foetus)
- Amino acids
- Fetal bovine serum
- Hydrolyzed gelatin
- Sodium phosphate
- Sodium chloride
- Hydrolyzed gelatin
- Recombinant human albumin
- Neomycin – an antibiotic
- Other buffer and media ingredients – “Other” ingredients? Not listed? Why not and exactly what are those unknown ingredients in the injection?
That toxic cocktail is NOT a placebo anywhere else in ‘science.’ This is yet another example of how scientific data can be inaccurate and misleading. Say ‘placebo’ to the average man on the street and he will think you are referring to an inert substance like water. This is not the case with vaccine testing and the only place in medical research where this non-placebo placebo is used.
In the ‘placebo’ used in this trial, the only thing different to the MMR vaccine that it was tested against, is the lack of the viral antigen. This study was also limited in its scope to merely 10 types of reported reactions other than local skin reactions and fevers.
This practice of using non-standard placebos in vaccine trials isn’t unusual, it’s the norm. It’s just how they roll. You see, vaccines aren’t classified as drugs; instead, they are classified by the American government as biologicals. However, in Australia they are specifically not classed as biologicals, but come under the heading of therapeutic goods. This is how they are getting away with the seriously dangerous practice of not testing the products against inert placebos because vaccines don’t have the same regulatory rules as drugs.
Pixie is on a journey to empower others to live a toxin-free life. Her personal interests include human rights, ethical marketing, Hermetic principals. Pixie just published her first book titled Agnotology in Vaccines.
Pixie is/has been; an author, editor, avid reader, online marketer, researcher, mother, autodidact, weight loss survivor and is a connoisseur of wines with two years oenology study completed.
You can find Pixie’s book at http://www.detoxnaturalliving.com/agnotology.html