First Vaccinated Versus Nonvaccinated Peer Review Study Published
Finally, it’s happened; the first vaccinated versus nonvaccinated children’s health peer review study has been published in the Journal of Translational Science . The study titled “Pilot comparative study on the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated 6- to 12- year old U.S. children” is published as an open access text, thankfully, which everyone—bar none—should read, especially if you are a parent or grandparent.
With 71 References and nine charts, it clearly represents documented proof of what the authors were able to ascertain, when in the Conclusions they state:
Assessment of the long-term effects of the vaccination schedule on morbidity and mortality has been limited . In this pilot study of vaccinated and unvaccinated homeschool children, reduced odds of chickenpox and whooping cough were found among the vaccinated, as expected, but unexpectedly increased odds were found for many other physician-diagnosed conditions. Although the cross-sectional design of the study limits causal interpretation, the strength and consistency of the findings, the apparent “dose-response” relationship between vaccination status and several forms of chronic illness, and the significant association between vaccination and NDDs [Neurodevelopmental disorders] all support the possibility that some aspect of the current vaccination program could be contributing to risks of childhood morbidity.
Vaccination also remained significantly associated with NDD after controlling for other factors, whereas preterm birth, long considered a major risk factor for NDD, was not associated with NDD after controlling for the interaction between preterm birth and vaccination. In addition, preterm birth coupled with vaccination was associated with an apparent synergistic increase in the odds of NDD above that of vaccination alone. Nevertheless, the study findings should be interpreted with caution. First, additional research is needed to replicate the findings in studies with larger samples and stronger research designs. Second, subject to replication, potentially detrimental factors associated with the vaccination schedule should be identified and addressed and underlying mechanisms better understood. Such studies are essential in order to optimize the impact of vaccination of children’s health. 
One of the paper’s statements ‘jumped out’ at me:
Although short-term immunologic and safety testing is performed on vaccines prior to their approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the long-term effects of individual vaccines and of the vaccination program itself remain unknown . Vaccines are acknowledged to carry risks of severe acute and chronic adverse effects, such as neurological complications and even death , but such risks are considered so rare that the vaccination program is believed to be safe and effective for virtually all children . [CJF emphasis]
[Please refer to online article for embedded reference numbers.]
I’ve been tracking vaccine/vaccinee issues since the latter part of the 1980s when we first started hearing parents complain their children were negatively impacted by vaccines they received. What’s happened, in essence, is the push to vaccinate for every possible issue (not a hangnail, yet, but maybe soon) has changed the disease paradigm for young children from communicable infectious diseases, which once contracted usually provided lifelong immunity, to chronic diseases that last a lifetime and provide long-term revenue streams for many segments in healthcare. Chronic illnesses earlier in life create perpetual customers for pharmaceutical drugs, medical services and interventions, and even healthcare insurance plans. Here’s some proof of that shift, as taken from the paper in question:
Vaccinated children were significantly more likely than the unvaccinated to have been diagnosed with the following: allergic rhinitis (10.4% vs. 0.4%, p <0.001; OR 30.1, 95% CI: 4.1, 219.3), other allergies (22.2% vs. 6.9%, p <0.001; OR 3.9, 95% CI: 2.3, 6.6), eczema/atopic dermatitis (9.5% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.035; OR 2.9, 95% CI: 1.4, 6.1), a learning disability (5.7% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.003; OR 5.2, 95% CI: 1.6, 17.4), ADHD (4.7% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.013; OR 4.2, 95% CI: 1.2, 14.5), ASD [Autism Spectrum Disorder] (4.7% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.013; OR 4.2, 95% CI: 1.2, 14.5), any neurodevelopmental disorder (i.e., learning disability, ADHD or ASD) (10.5% vs. 3.1%, p <0.001; OR 3.7, 95% CI: 1.7, 7.9) and any chronic illness (44.0% vs. 25.0%, p <0.001; OR 2.4, 95% CI: 1.7, 3.3). No significant differences were observed with regard to cancer, chronic fatigue, conduct disorder, Crohn’s disease, depression, Types 1 or 2 diabetes, encephalopathy, epilepsy, hearing loss, high blood pressure, inflammatory bowel disease, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, obesity, seizures, Tourette’s syndrome, or services received under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (Table 3). [CJF emphasis]
Personally, I tend to think the following statement by the authors is indicative of where the CDC/FDA are to blame for not mandating longer research time and accurate data, or complete disclosure not just favorable studies, prior to licensure of vaccines which, by the way, the CDC owns numerous ‘money-maker’ vaccines:
The nonspecific effects of some vaccines appear to be beneficial, while in others they appear to increase morbidity and mortality [22,23]. For instance, both the measles and Bacillus Calmette–Guérin vaccine reportedly reduce overall morbidity and mortality , whereas the diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis  and hepatitis B vaccines  have the opposite effect. The mechanisms responsible for these nonspecific effects are unknown but may involve inter alia: interactions between vaccines and their ingredients, e.g., whether the vaccines are live or inactivated; the most recently administered vaccine; micronutrient supplements such as vitamin A; the sequence in which vaccines are given; and their possible combined and cumulative effects . [CJF emphasis]
However, maybe CDC/FDA aren’t to blame that much, but the U.S. Congress, who gifted vaccine makers with carte blanche legal and financial product liabilities and a “get out of jail free card,” the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 (42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to 300aa-34), is to blame. That law is the real problem and Congress needs to rescind it, as it’s been hijacked, especially by the Vaccine Court Masters’ lack of due diligence in considering documented vaccine research fraud and neurotoxins in vaccines as implicating and causing vaccinee damages, in my opinion. That law, however, applies only to children’s vaccines, per some legal experts and an article by reporter Jon Rappoport, who says numerous lawsuits have been filed against Merck about its shingles vaccine, Zostavax®.
Will Congress become motivated at the behest of Big Pharma lobbyists to exempt similar product liability for adult vaccines, since the CDC/FDA are pushing mandatory adult vaccine schedules?
NCVIA was signed into law by President Ronald Reagan, a Republican, on November 14, 1986. Republicans historically have big business backs covered! Healthcare consumers must be on their guard with the new Republican president, Donald J Trump, and his meddling around with healthcare issues, especially his “TrumpCare” version of ObamaCare, a disaster forced by Democrats on consumers. We don’t need another healthcare insurance disaster! Furthermore, where’s the vaccine investigation committee Trump was interested in setting up? How come it’s not up and running?
ObamaCare must be scuttled or revised ethically and correctly so as not to aggrandize corporate or vested interests all along the up and down lines of healthcare and medicine, e.g., health insurance plans, doctors’ services, Big Pharma and ancillary care products producers, etc.
Vaccines are being ‘groomed’ to become THE key healthcare ‘prophylactic’ plus installing legal processes that impinge upon constitutional rights by state laws and the CDC’s self-granted unconstitutional empowerments, which I wrote about in September 2016.
Like Merck and Company’s pioneer vaccine inventor, Dr Maurice Hilleman, disclosed about vaccines in this video, “Vaccines have to be considered the bargain basement technology for the 20th century.” Why are they being mandated in the 21st century?
Resource if the journal link doesn’t work
Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.
Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.
Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.
Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)