Studies Prove Without Doubt That Unvaccinated Children Are Far Healthier

By Christina England, VacTruth

(orig. published Feb, 2014)

A study from the 1990s has come to light, proving that compared to unvaccinated children, vaccinated children were more likely to suffer from asthma, eczema, ear infections, hyperactivity and many other chronic conditions. Furthermore, the study identified that there was a ten-fold increase in the incidence of tonsillitis in the children who were vaccinated, and a total lack tonsillectomy operations among the children who were unvaccinated.

In 1992, the Immunization Awareness Society (IAS) conducted a survey to examine the health of New Zealand’s children. Unsurprisingly, the results of their study indicated that unvaccinated children were far healthier than vaccinated children.

Questionnaires were given out to IAS members, their friends and their associates asking various health questions. A total of 245 families returned their questionnaires, giving the researchers a total of 495 children surveyed. Of these children, 226 were vaccinated and 269 were unvaccinated.

Healthy Children and Ethics

The ages of the children ranged between the ages of two weeks – 46 years (obviously some friends were older with older children). Of the children studied, 273 were males and 216 were females. (Six children were unclassified.)

Sue Claridge, who reported on the study, wrote:

Respondents were asked to provide the year of birth, gender, vaccinations received, whether or not the child suffered from a range of chronic conditions (asthma, eczema, ear infections/glue ear, recurring tonsillitis, hyperactivity, diabetes or epilepsy) whether or not he or she needed grommets, had had a tonsillectomy, or were shown to develop motor skills (walking, crawling, sitting-up etc.). Parents also provided information on breastfeeding and bottle feeding and when a child was weaned if breastfed.

During the study, another interesting fact emerged. Researchers discovered that 92 percent of the children requiring a tonsillectomy operation had received the measles vaccination, indicating that the vaccination for measles may have made some of the children more susceptible to tonsillitis.

The study also revealed that 81 of the families had both vaccinated and unvaccinated children. Many of these families had vaccinated their older children but had grown more reluctant to vaccinate their younger children, due to their growing concerns regarding vaccine safety.
Researchers concluded that:
While this was a very limited study, particularly in terms of the numbers of unvaccinated children that were involved and the range of chronic conditions investigated, it provides solid scientific evidence in support of considerable anecdotal evidence that unvaccinated children are healthier that their vaccinated peers. [1]
Although governments from around the world have continually stated that studying vaccinated versus unvaccinated children would be unethical, the New Zealand researchers are not the only group of researchers to study comparisons.

Vaccinated Children 5 Times More Likely To Suffer From A Range Of Diseases

In September 2011, German researchers carrying out a longitudinal study surveyed a total of 8000 unvaccinated children from the ages of 0 –19. As with the New Zealand study, researchers collected their data by conducting a survey using questionnaires. [2]

Results showed that vaccinated children were up to five times more likely to suffer from a variety of diseases and disorders than unvaccinated children.

Their results were compared to another German study (KiGGS), which examined a larger sample group consisting of 17,461 participants between the ages of 0 –17.

Dr. Andreas Bachair, a German classical homeopathic practitioner, responsible for collecting the results of the survey from the website stated that:

Asthma, hay fever and neurodermatitis are seen very frequently today. A recent German study with 17461 children between 0-17 years of age (KIGGS) showed that 4.7% of these children suffer from asthma, 10.7% of these children from hay fever and 13.2% from neurodermatitis. These numbers differ in western countries, i.e. the prevalence of asthma among children in the US is 6% whereas it is 14-16% in Australia (Australia’s Health 2004, AIHW).

The prevalence of asthma among unvaccinated children in our study is around 2.5%, hay fever, 3%, and neurodermatitis, 7%. According to the KIGGS study more than 40% of children between the ages of 3 and 17 years were sensitized against at least one allergen tested (20 common allergens were tested) and 22.9% had an allergic disease. Although we did not perform a blood test, around 10% stated that their children had an allergy. [3]

(As this study is a longitudinal study, the number of children being studied has since risen to 13,222. To join the study, you can fill in the questionnaire provided by clicking on the link listed as the third reference at the end of this article.)

Although there were four cases of autism reported among unvaccinated children, Dr. Bachair reported that:

Of these 4 children one tested very high for metals (mercury, aluminium, arsenic); in another case the mother was tested very high for mercury.

However, this number pales into insignificance when we compare it to the 1 in 88 children currently being reported as autistic by the CDC. [4]

Other Conditions Found To Be Almost Non-Existent In Unvaccinated Children

Dr. Andreas Bachair continued her report by stating that their study found the prevalence of sinusitis, warts, skin problems and middle ear infections were also much lower in the unvaccinated children, as were the cases of diabetes and epilepsy.

She went on to say that the results demonstrated that the prevalence of many conditions in the unvaccinated children were also significantly lower. These were:

Other disorders and diseases
As we included open questions in our survey we evaluated the prevalence (of the first 10,070 participants) of some other disorders and illnesses. Unvaccinated children show very low prevalences of the following disorders:
  • Dyslexia: 0.21%
  • Speech delay/articulation problems: 0.38%
  • Sensory Processing disorder: 0.28%
  • Anxiety: 0.25%
  • Depression: 0.12%
  • Bedwetting: 0.12%
  • Celiac disease: 0.12%
  • Gluten sensitivity: 0.41%
  • GERD (Gastroesophageal reflux disease): 0.06%
Dr. Bachair concluded her amazing and intuitive paper by adding a number of statements from parents, which I believe really added weight to her overall findings.


I find it amazing that despite mainstream media and leading government agencies stressing repeatedly that studies comparing vaccinated children to unvaccinated children cannot take place for ethical reasons, groups around the world are taking it upon themselves to do these studies anyway.

While surveys of this kind are often dismissed as being purely epidemiological and passed off as little more than stamp collecting, I believe that studies of this nature should not be dismissed out of hand. After all, many stamp collections contain just one stamp that is worth far more than its weight in gold.

These studies show without doubt that unvaccinated children are healthier than their vaccinated peers and, for this reason, these studies should be given careful consideration by all parents and professionals studying vaccination safety.
Photo Credit

This article first appeared at VacTruth.

Christina was born and educated in London, U.K. She left school to work in a children's library, specializing in story telling and book buying. In 1978 Christina changed her career path to dedicate her time to caring for the elderly and was awarded the title of Care Giver of the Year for her work with the elderly in 1980. In1990 she adopted the first of two disabled boys, both with challenging behavior, complex disabilities and medical needs. In 1999 she was accused of Munchausen by Proxy after many failed attempts to get the boys’ complex needs met. Finally, she was cleared of all accusations after the independent psychologist Lisa Blakemore-Brown gave both boys the diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder and ADHD as part of what she described to be a complex tapestry of disorders. During the assessments Ms Blakemore-Brown discovered through the foster care diaries that the eldest boy had reacted adversely to the MMR vaccine. 

After taking an A Level in Psychology and a BTEC in Learning Disabilities Ms. England spent many years researching vaccines and adverse reactions. She went on to gain a Higher National Diploma in journalism and media and currently writes for the American Chronicle, the Weekly Blitz, VacTruth and Namaste Publishing UK on immunization safety and efficacy whilst continuing to study for a BA Honors degree in English Literature and Humanities. England’s main areas of expertise are researching false allegations of child abuse and adverse reactions to vaccines. Her work is read internationally and has been translated into many languages. Ms England has been a guest on many radio shows and has spoken at seminars worldwide. She is the co author to the book Shaken Baby Syndrome or Vaccine Induced Encephalitis – Are Parents Being Falsely Accused?’ with Dr Harold Buttram.

Share the Health!


  1. I have a friend who's a pediatrician. When I send her info like this she say's it's total crap. How do I get through to her? My kids are grown.

    1. People who go to medical school are brainwashed. They have to follow what they are told or else. Medical school never cultivate independence and thinking, they insist on conformity.

    2. Probably because these stupid articles claim "a study showed..." and then fail to actually cite the study. The only references are from other websites such as Health Impact News which are going to be biased in the same manner as this site.

  2. That which is really unethical is injecting crap into innocent little children thus giving them lifelong illness. All for profit and control.

  3. I have not had any vaccine for years now. No flu vaccine since I was always sick with the vaccines.

  4. Where is a link to the 1990 study?

  5. researchers collected their data by conducting a survey using questionnaires

    Actually, it's even worse. They collected their data by using self-selecting questionnaires. People who obviously have a vested interest in the outcome of such "studies". Anecdotal evidence, isn't evidence.

  6. One question: the studies focus on lists of diseases and allergies, but no data is given on the diseases that were vaccinated against??? The study would definitely carry more weight if it also showed data regarding the prevalence of measles, chicken pox, rubella, mumps, meningitis etc. within the two groups. I don't see anything unethical about doing such a study, but please provide us with ALL of the information, not just the info that would support your theory.

  7. You do realize that the "study" was done by a group of parents in New Zealand who wanted to prove immunization had no benefits. This is nonsense, and if anyone cares to look past the first page of Google results and spend about an hour on the real "science," they will see that the anti-vax movement makes about as much sense as the anti-climate change movement, and the birthers. Same lunacy, different groups.

  8. Yes, where is the link to the 1990s New Zealand study? I can't find it anywhere.

  9. Name me a cure that was developed by a Pharma to eradicate any of these cited maladies. I'm not talking about maintenance drugs, I'm talkin' CURE.

  10. The death blow to vaccinators is to ask them why vaccination was introduced after the diseases designed to be eradicated were already in terminal decline.

  11. And you do realize, I hope, that the overall and unequivocal findings of the NZ study were confirmed by the results of the more recent German study?
    And that ASD's are virtually non-existent amongst unvaccinated children, but 1 in 88 in the US vaccinated population?
    So please, spare us the appeal to "real science", which I suspect you would not even recognize if it came up and slapped you in the face.
    And btw, climate change is denied by no-one; rather, whether this change is due to anthropogenic reasons or not.
    ( It isn't, for the avoidance of doubt.)

  12. Absolutely true.
    But if the material being taught was medically sound, this demand for conformity would not be such a bad thing. But as the entire "profession" was prostituted out to the Rockefeller crime cartel at the beginning of the last century, what we are today left with is a satanic counterfeit of healthcare, which invariably seeks only to enrich the pharmaceutical shareholders, and the "profession" itself, at the expense of the helpless patient.

  13. Pure, and malignant, sophistry.
    Put it this way. If these parents had experienced positive health outcomes post-vaccination, then they would be the first to laud the technique; and to ensure that later children were vaccinated as well.
    But they didn't; anything but.
    So they did not vaccinate later children; and guess what?
    They remained healthy.

  14. Excellent point; I have borrowed it in my conclusion to my post.

  15. Your premise has no foundation. Therefore, your conclusion has no merit. You are ignoring context and the bias in self-selection while asserting a premise for which there is zero evidence.

  16. My problem with this report is that ignores the obvious fact that unvaccinated children, in a population where most are vaccinated, receive the benefit of a vaccinated population. When I grew up in the 50's, not only my father but 2 classmates had polio.
    They certainly were not healthier, in an unvaccinated population.

    In unvaccinated populations everyone's chance of acquiring polio or measles, etc is increased. In a mostly vaccinated population those few who are not vaccinated receive the benefits provided by general herd immunization.

    I did not have my children vaccinated because I understood it was not necessary since most were. If the situation were reversed (as it was during the polio epidemic of my youth), this would have been a reckless choice.

    Of course the Salk polio vaccines were very different from today's. I am not an advocate of all vaccines at all. But we have to put it all in context: when polio has been wiped out through vaccinations, it is of course safe for a minority to decline vaccinations; but in an environment like the 50's, where tens of thousands were crippled with polio, it would be folly to decline vaccination, if the vaccine itself were not toxic. Today's vaccines are often toxic compared to what once was the norm.
    This too must be taken into consideration in assessing whether children should be vaccinated. Context, in terms of health, is--as with most other issues--everything.

    This study is also dated, very small, and the respondents, are self-selected, introducing not evidence but anecdotal incidents. This is not good science.

  17. Pretty trivial to debunk:

  18. Wow and of course the govt. Studies run by Big Pharma would never do a bias study, right?
    Check out this great 5 min. Video on you tube: Measles, back in the days before Marketing of the vaccines.

  19. It was deadly.

  20. Actually just as common in the unvaccinated.

  21. That's a bad reason not to vaccinate. It's exactly the thinking that results in breaking herd immunity.

    Today's vaccines are safer than ever.

  22. The question is how does she get through to you?

  23. Hello my good friends please do not see this strange cause it my life story about my healing, i was having HIV for good 6yrs. Things were not working fine for me due to my health status i know longer have friends know lover it even takes time before my family co-operate with me due to this i tried all possible means i can to get this devilish sickness out of my body i went to hospitals churches and other heath organization but all remains the same till yet i never gave up cos i was not born with this illness so i decided to take it over to the internet to see if i could get remedy, on my search i saw a testimony of a woman, she said she was also having a terrible sickness for over 3yrs but now she is healed i was surprise at first when i saw her test so she wrote a name Dr Molemen and also gave his email id so i mailed them which is ( i told them about my problem and after the processes he told me that am healed but i never believed he told me to go and confirm it from the hospital were i have been taking treatment still i never believed also although he gave me evidence that the sickness was gone. Finally i decided to go for check up and to my surprise my doctor said the sickness was know longer there with thought of joy i started shearing tears. My friends today am now married bless with 2kids, so if you have any sickness kindly email ( or call him on (+2347036013351)sir i will forever remain in you debt. Thank you sir am grateful.


Receive all updates via Facebook. Just Click the Like Button Below...